Fillable Printable Full Feasibility Analysis Temaplate
Fillable Printable Full Feasibility Analysis Temaplate
Full Feasibility Analysis Temaplate
■ 70 ■
APPENDIX 3.1
Full Feasibility Analysis
Note: All fields can be expanded to provide additional space to respond to the questions.
A copy of this template, along with each of the assessment tools, is available in MS Word
and PDF format at the authors’ Web site at http://www.bus.ucf.edu/barringer.
I NTRODUCTION
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Concept Statement Test
• Write a concept statement for your product/service idea. Show the concept statement
to 5 to 10 people. Select people who will give you informed and candid feedback.
• Attach a blank sheet to the concept statement, and ask the people who read the
statement to (1) tell you three things they like about your product/service idea, (2)
provide three suggestions for making it better, (3) tell you whether they think the
product or service idea is feasible (or will be successful), and (4) share any additional
comments or suggestions.
• Summarize the information you obtain from the concept statement into the follow-
ing three categories:
• Strengths of the product or service idea—things people who evaluated your prod-
uct or service concept said they “liked” about the idea
• Suggestions for strengthening the idea—suggestions made by people for strength-
ening or improving the idea
• Overall feasibility of the product or service concept—report the number of people
who think the idea is feasible, the number of people who think it isn’t feasible, and
any additional comments that were made
• Other comments and suggestions
A. Name of the proposed business
B. Name of the founder (or founders)
C. One paragraph summary of the business
A. Product/service desirability
B. Product/service demand
PART 1: PRODUCT/SERVICE F EASIBILITY
ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THIS PART
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 70
CHAPTER 3 Feasibility Analysis 71 ■
Buying Intentions Survey
• Distribute the concept statement to 15 to 30 prospective customers (do not include
any of the people who completed the concept statement test) with the following
buying intentions survey attached. Ask each participant to read the concept state-
ment and complete the buying intentions survey. Record the number of people who
participated in the survey and the results of the survey here.
• Along with the raw data recorded here, report the percentage of the total number of
people you surveyed that said they would probably buy or definitely would buy your
product or service if offered. This percentage is the most important figure in gauging
potential customer interest.
• One caveat is that people who say that they intend to purchase a product do not al-
ways follow through, so the numbers resulting from this activity are almost always
optimistic. Still, the numbers provide you with a preliminary indication of how your
most likely customers will respond to your potential product or service offering.
How likely would you be to buy the product or service described above?
______ Definitely would buy
______ Probably would buy
______ Might or might not buy
______ Probably would not buy
______ Definitely would not buy
Additional questions may be added to the buying intentions survey.
Conclusion (expand fields and report findings, in discussion form, for each area)
A. Product/service desirability
B. Product/service demand
C. Product/service feasibility (circle the correct response)
Not Feasible Unsure Feasible
D. Suggestions for improving product/service feasibility.
A. Industry attractiveness
B. Target market attractiveness
C. Timeliness of entry into the target market
PART 2: INDUSTRY/MARKET F EASIBILITY
ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THIS PART
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Industry Attractiveness
• To the extent possible, assess the industry at the five-digit NAICS code level your
potential business will be entering. Use a broader industry category (less NCICS
digits) if appropriate (http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naicstab.htm).
• Assess the attractiveness of the industry the potential business plans to enter on
each of the following dimensions.
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 71
Industry Attractiveness Assessment Tool
(used to assess the broad industry, rather than the specific target market, you plan to enter)
■ 72 PART II What to Do Before the Business Plan Is Written
Low Potential Moderate Potential
High Potential
1. Number of competitors Many Few None
2. Age of industry Old Middle aged Young
3. Growth rate of industry Little or no
growth
Moderate growth Strong growth
4. Average net income for
firms in the industry
Low Medium High
5. Degree of industry
concentration
Concentrated Neither
concentrated
nor fragmented
Fragmented
6. Stage of industry life cycle Maturity phase
or decline
phase
Growth phase Emergence
phase
7. Importance of industry’s
products and/or services
to customers
“Ambivalent” “Would like to
have”
“Must have”
8. Extent to which business
and environmental trends
are moving in favor of the
industry
Low Medium High
9. Number of exciting new prod-
uct and services emerging
from the industry
Low Medium High
10. Long-term prospects Weak Neutral Strong
Target Market Attractiveness
• Identify the portion or specific market within your broader industry that you plan to
target.
• Assess the attractiveness of the target market on each of the following dimensions.
Low Potential Moderate Potential High Potential
1. Number of competitors in
target market
Many Few None
2. Growth rate of firms in the
target market
Little to no
growth
Slow growth Rapid growth
Target Market Attractiveness Assessment Tool
(used to assess the specific target market, rather than the broader industry, you plan to enter)
3.
Average net income for
firms in the target market
Low Medium High
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 72
CHAPTER 3 Feasibility Analysis 73 ■
4.
Methods for generating
revenue in the industry
Unclear Somewhat clear Clear
5.
Ability to create “barriers
to entry” for potential
competitors
Unable to
create
May or may not be
able to create
Can create
6.
Degree to which customers
feel satisfied by the current
offerings in the target market
Satisfied Neither satisfied
or dissatisfied
Unsatisfied
7.
Potential to employ low cost
guerrilla and/or buzz market-
ing techniques to promote the
firm’s product or services
Low Moderate High
8.
Excitement surrounding new
product/service offerings in
the target market
Low Medium High
Low Potential Moderate Potential High Potential
1. Buying mood of customers Customers are
not in a buy-
ing mood
Customers are
in a moderate
buying mood
Customers are
in an aggres-
sive buying
mood
2. Momentum of the market Stable to losing
momentum
Slowly gaining
momentum
Rapidly gaining
momentum
Market Timeliness
• Determine the extent to which the “window of opportunity” for the proposed busi-
ness is open or closed based on the following criteria.
• Determine the timeliness of entering a specific target market based on other criteria.
Market Timeliness Assessment Tool
3. Need for a new firm in the
market with your offerings
or geographic location
Low Moderate High
4. Extent to which business and
environmental trends are
moving in favor of the target
market
Low Medium High
Low Potential Moderate Potential High Potential
5. Recent or planned entrance
of large firms into the
market
Large firms
entering
the market
Rumors that large
firms may be
entering the
market
No larger firms
entered the
market or
are rumored
to be enter-
ing the
market
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 73
Conclusion (expand fields and report findings, in discussion form, for each area)
■ 74 PART II What to Do Before the Business Plan Is Written
Low Potential Moderate Potential High Potential
1. Passion for the business
idea
Low Moderate High
2. Relevant industry
experience
None Moderate Extensive
A. Industry attractiveness
B. Target market attractiveness
C. Market timeliness
C. Industry/market feasibility (circle the correct response)
Not Feasible Unsure Feasible
E. Suggestions for improving industry/market feasibility.
PART 3: ORGANIZATIONAL F EASIBILITY
ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THIS PART
A. Management prowess
B. Resource sufficiency
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Management Prowess
• Use the following table to candidly and objectively rate the “prowess” of the
founder or group of founders who will be starting the proposed venture.
Management Prowess Assessment Tool
3. Prior entrepreneurial
experience
None Moderate Extensive
4. Depth of professional and
social networks
Weak Moderate Strong
5. Creativity among manage-
ment team members
Low Moderate High
6. Experience and expertise in
cash flow management
None Moderate High
7. College graduate No college
education
Some college
education but
not currently in
college
Graduated or
are currently
in college
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 74
CHAPTER 3 Feasibility Analysis 75 ■
Resource Sufficiency
• The focus in this section is on nonfinancial resources. Use the following table to rate
your “resource sufficiency” in each category.
• The list of resources is not meant to be exhaustive. A list of the 6 to 12 most critical
nonfinancial resources for your proposed business is sufficient.
An explanation of the rating system used in the first portion of the table is as follows:
① Available
② Likely to be available: will probably be available and will be within my budget
③ Unlikely to be available: will probably be hard to find or gain access to, and may
exceed my budget
④ Unavailable
⑤ NA: not applicable for my business
Resource Sufficiency Assessment Tool
Ratings Resource Sufficiency
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Office space
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Lab space, manufacturing space, or space to launch a
service business
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Contract manufacturers or outsource providers
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Key management employees (now and in the future)
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Key support personnel (now and in the future)
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Key equipment needed to operate the business
(computers, machinery, delivery vehicles)
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Ability to obtain intellectual property protection on key
aspects of the business
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Support of local and state government if applicable for
business launch
① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Ability to form favorable business partnerships
Ratings: Strong, Neutral,
or Weak
_________________________ Proximity to similar firms (for the purpose of knowledge
sharing)
_________________________ Proximity to suppliers
_________________________
_________________________
Proximity to customers
Proximity to a major research university (if applicable)
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 75
Conclusion (expand fields and report findings, in discussion form, for each area)
■ 76 PART II What to Do Before the Business Plan Is Written
A. Management prowess
B. Resource sufficiency
C. Organizational feasibility (circle the correct response)
Not Feasible Unsure Feasible
D. Suggestions for improving organizational feasibility
PART 4: FINANCIAL F EASIBILITY
ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THIS PART
A. Total startup cash needed
B. Financial performance of similar businesses
C. Overall financial attractiveness of the proposed venture
ASSESSMENT TOOLS
Total Start-up Cash Needed
• The startup costs (which include capital investments and operating expenses) should
include all the costs necessary for the business to make its first sale. New firms typi-
cally need money for a host of purposes, including the hiring of personnel, office or
manufacturing space, equipment, training, research and development, marketing,
and the initial product rollout.
• At the feasibility analysis stage, it is not necessary for the number to be exact. How-
ever, the number should be fairly accurate to give an entrepreneur an idea of the
dollar amount that will be needed to launch the firm. After the approximate dollar
amount is known, the entrepreneur should determine specifically where the money
will come from to cover the startup costs.
• The total startup cash needed can be estimate using the following table.
Total Startup Cash Needed (to Make First Sale)
Capital Investments Amount
Property ____________________________________
Furniture and fixtures ____________________________________
Computer equipment ____________________________________
Other equipment ____________________________________
Vehicles ____________________________________
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 76
CHAPTER 3 Feasibility Analysis 77 ■
Comparison of the Financial Performance of Proposed Venture to Similar Firms
• Use the following tables to compare the proposed new venture to similar firms in
regard to annual sales (Year 1 and Year 2) and profitability (Year 1 and Year 2).
Operating Expenses Amount
Legal, accounting, and professional services ____________________________________
Advertising and promotions ____________________________________
Deposits for utilities ____________________________________
Licenses and permits ____________________________________
Prepaid insurance ____________________________________
Lease payments ____________________________________
Salary and wages ____________________________________
Payroll taxes ____________________________________
Travel ____________________________________
Signs
Tools and supplies ____________________________________
Starting inventory ____________________________________
Cash (working capital) ____________________________________
Other expense 1 ____________________________________
Other expense 2 ____________________________________
Total Startup Cash Needed ____________________________________=
Comparison of the Financial Performance of Proposed Venture to Similar Firms
Assessment Tool
Annual Sales
Estimate of Proposed Venture’s Explanation of How the Estimate
Annual Sales—Year 1 Was Computed
Estimate of Year 1 Sales _____ ____________________________
Summary: How proposed annual sales, on average,
____________________________
compares to similar firms (circle one)
____________________________
Below Average Average Above Average ____________________________
Estimate of Year 2 Sales _____ ____________________________
Summary: How proposed annual sales, on average,
____________________________
compares to similar firms (circle one)
____________________________
Below Average Average Above Average ____________________________
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 77
■ 78 PART II What to Do Before the Business Plan Is Written
Net Income
Estimate of Proposed Venture’s Explanation of How the Estimate
Net Income—Year 1 Was Computed
Estimate of Year 1 Net Income __________ ____________________________
Summary: How proposed net income, on average,
____________________________
compares to similar firms (circle one)
____________________________
Below Average Average Above Average ____________________________
Estimate of Year 2 Net Income __________ ____________________________
Summary: How proposed net income, on average,
____________________________
compares to similar firms (circle one)
____________________________
Below Average Average Above Average ____________________________
Overall Financial Attractiveness of the Proposed Venture
• The following factors are important in regard to the overall financial attractiveness
of the proposed business.
• Assess the strength of each factor in the following table.
Overall Financial Attractiveness of Proposed Venture Assessment Tool
Low Potential Moderate Potential High Potential
1.
Steady and rapid growth in
sales during the first one to
three years in a clearly
defined target market
Unlikely Moderately likely Highly likely
2. High percentage of recurring
income—meaning that once
you win a client, the client
will provide recurring
sources of revenue
Low Moderate Strong
3. Ability to forecast income
and expenses with a
reasonable degree of
certainty
Weak Moderate Strong
4. Likelihood that internally
generated funds will be
available within two years
to finance growth
Unlikely Moderately likely Highly likely
5. Availability of exit
opportunity for investor
if applicable
Unlikely to be
unavailable
May be available Likely to be
available
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 78
CHAPTER 3 Feasibility Analysis 79 ■
OVERALL F EASIBILITY: SUMMARY AND C ONCLUSION
Conclusion (report finding for each area)
A. Total startup cash needed
B. Financial performance of similar businesses
C. Financial feasibility (circle the correct response)
Not Feasible Unsure Feasible
D. Suggestions for improving financial feasibility
Overall Feasibility of
the Business Idea Based
on Each Part
Suggestions for Improving
the Feasibility
Product/Market Not feasible ______________________________
Feasibility
Unsure ______________________________
Feasible ______________________________
Industry/Market
Feasibility
Not feasible
______________________________
Unsure
______________________________
Feasible
______________________________
Organizational
Feasibility
Not feasible
______________________________
Unsure
______________________________
Feasible
______________________________
Financial Feasibility
Not feasible
______________________________
Unsure
______________________________
Feasible
______________________________
Overall Assessment
Not feasible
______________________________
Unsure
______________________________
Feasible
______________________________
Conclusion—briefly summarize your justification for your overall assessment.
M03_BARR8326_01_SE_C03.QXD 11/21/07 10:00 AM Page 79
