Fillable Printable Standard Project Prioritization Template
Fillable Printable Standard Project Prioritization Template
Standard Project Prioritization Template
Project Prioritization Criteria Potential Points Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5
1. Transportation Access- select ALL that apply [see Center and Overview maps]
Provides direct access to schools and/or public facilities 3
Provides direct access to jobs and/or shopping 3
Provides direct access to parks/recreation 3
Provides direct access to transit (train or bus) 3
Provides direct access to residential neighborhoods 3
max score 15 0 0 0 0 0
2. Connectivity- select ONE [see Center and Overview maps]
Connects to existing bicycle/pedestrian facilities on both ends 15
Connects to existing bicycle/pedestrian facilities on one end, or serves as an
alternative to a busy street
10
Connects to proposed bicycle/pedestrian facilities on one or both ends
5
max score 15 0 0 0 0 0
3. Safety- select ONE [see Crash maps]
The project is on a high-crash corridor (as designated in the Plan) 15
The project is on a road with 2+ reported crashes but not a high-crash
corridor (per the Plan)
10
The project is on a roadway with <2 reported crashes (per the Plan) 5
max score 15 0 0 0 0 0
4. Local Impact- select ALL that apply
[use your best judgement]
Increases local economic development 4
Increases tourism 4
Has the ability to serve the most people 0 to 5
max score 13 0 0 0 0 0
5. Environmental Justice- select ALL that apply
[see Moving Dutchess maps/text]
Serves a low-income population 4
Serves a minority (including Hispanic) and/or limited-English speaking
population
4
Provides access for older adults and/or young people [senior housing, senior
centers, schools]
4
max score 12 0 0 0 0 0
6. Local support- select ONE [check Ch 2- Literature Review p.9-18; leave blank if unsure]
Full local support: in an adopted plan & actively being pursued 10
Some local support: in an adopted plan but not actively being pursued 5
Potential future support: not in an adopted plan and not being actively
pursued
0
max score 10 0 0 0 0 0
7. Agency Coordination- select ONE [based on road type & property owners]
Local municipality only 10
Municipality + County or other local agency 5
Municipality + State or Federal agency 0
max score 10 0 0 0 0 0
8. Ability to Implement - select ONE [use your best judgement]
Feasible and ready for implementation; likely to be funded 10
Requires further study; potential to be constructed; potential to be funded
5
Significant constraints: major construction; inter-jurisdictional coordination,
funding will be challenging
0
max score 10 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 100 0 0 0 0 0
Rank each project according to the categories below. Add notes as needed.
Appendix L: Project Prioritization Template
Effective March 27, 2014
L-1
Project Prioritization Template
