Fillable Printable Student Teaching Observation Feedback Form

Student Teaching Observation Feedback Form

Student'Teaching'Observation'Feedback'Form'

Date'_______________________''Student'Teacher'___________________________________________________'

Subject/Grade'____________________________'School'____________________________________________________________'

Time/Period'_______________________________________'Content'Area'___________________________________________'

Main'Topic'of'Lesson'_________________________________________________________________________________________'

1.#How#well#was#the#lesson#plan#written?##

0'There'was'no'lesson'plan'

1'The'lesson'plan'was'vague'

2'The'lesson'plan'gave'me'a'basic'idea'of'th e 'les so n '

3'The'lesson'plan'was'thorough'and'included'all'required'parts.'(see'check list)'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

2.How#well#did#the#teacher#candidate#carry#out#the#lesson#plan’s#objectives?#

0'There'were'no'objectives '

1'The'objectives'were'unclear'

2'Instruction'was'compatible'with'the'objectives'

3'The'teacher'candidate'clearly'understood'how'to'make'instr u ct ion 'com patible'with' th e'

objectives.'The'objectives'were'at'the'forefront'of'instruction,'questioning,'redir ec tin g ,'an d '

determining'if'students'were'learning.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

3.How#well#did#the#teacher#candidate#vary#instructional#strategies?#

0'There'was'no'variation'at'all.'

1'There'was'some'variation'but'the'strategies'were'disjointed.'

2'There'was'an'intentional,'planned'variation'of'instructional'strategies.'

3'Instructional'strategies'w er e'w e llPplanned'and'differentiated'to'meet'the'needs'of'all'

students.''

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

4.How#developmentally#appropriate#was#the#lesson?#

0'It'was'not'appropriate.'

1'It'would'be 'hard 'for'stud ents'to'learn'this'lesson ' du e'to'the'difficulty'of'the'concept'or'the'

teaching'stra tegies .'

2'The'lesson'was'appropriate'to'the'developmental'stage'of'the'students.'

3'The'lesson'was'not'only'appropriate,'the'teacher'candidate'differentiated'instruction'to'

includ e 'th e 'de v elo p menta l's ta ge s'o f'a ll'st u de n ts.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

5.How#well#did#the#teacher#candidate#manage#the#classroom#environment#during#the#

lesson ?#

0'The'classroom'environment'was'not'conducive'to'learning.'

1'The'teacher'candidate'had'difficulty'handling'inappropriate'behaviors.'The'structure'of'

the'less on 'a nd / or 'the 'cla ssr oo m 'con tribute d'to'po or'cla ssroo m 'm an ag em en t.'

2'Students'were'able'to'learn'in'this'classroom'environment.'

3'The'classroom'environment'was'a'safe'place'for'students'to'make'mistakes,'help'each'

other,'ask'questions,'and'be'themselves.'Inappropriate'behaviors'were'minimal.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

6.How#wellAprepared#was#the#teacher#candidate?#

0'The'teacher'candidate'was'completely'unprepared'for'this'lesson.'

1'The'candidate'was'disorganized,'which'affected'student'learning.'

2'The'candidate'had'materials'ready'and'always'knew'what'was'next'in'the'lesson.'

3'The'candidate'had'materials'ready,'knew'what'was'next'in'the'lesson,'and'anticipated'

student'responses.'Studen ts'were'eng aged'throu ghou t'the'lesson.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

7.How#well#did#the#teacher#candidate#demonstrate#knowledge#of#content?#

0'The'candidate'did'not'understand'the'content.'

1'The'candidate'was'knowledgeable'about'the'content'but'was'not'able'to'get'it'across'to'

the'studen ts.'

2'The'candidate'was'knowledgeable'about'the'content'and'was'able'to'teach'it'so'that'

students'understoo d.'

3'The'candidate'was'knowledgeable'about'the'content,'was'able'to'relate'it'to'students’'

lives,'and 'tea c h'so 'th at 'stu de n ts’'u nd e rsto o d.'T he 'ca n did a te'w a s'a b le'to 'an swer'stud e nt s’'

questions.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

8.How#well#does#the#teacher#candidate#use#communication#skills#while#teaching?#

0'The'candidate'uses'poor'grammar,'often'makes'writing'errors,'and/or'makes'mistakes'

when'reading'to'the'students.'(Choose'this'if'one'of'the'above'is'true.)'

1'The'candidate'often'uses'slang'and/or'makes'grammatical'errors.'

2'The'candidate'consistently'uses'good'grammar,'writing,'and'r e a d in g'skill s. '

3'The'candidate'consistently'uses'good'grammar,'writing,'and'reading'skills.'The'candidate'

shows'excitem ent'about'teaching'and'learning,'en g ag in g'st ud e nt s'in'th e 'pro c ess .'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

9.How#well#did#the#candidate#interact#with#the#other#adults#in#the#room?#

0'The'candidate'had'no'interaction'with'the'othe r'adu lts'in'the'ro om .'

1'The'candidate'spoke'with'the'other'adults'but'did'not'direct'them'or'access'their'

expertise'in'any'way.'

2'The'candidate'consulted'with'the'other'adults'in'the'room.'Paraprofessionals,'specialists,'

and/or'volunteers'were'asked'to'assist'students'in'specific'ways.'

3'The'candidate'had'a'plan'for'accessing'the'expertise'of'the'other'adults'in'the'room.'The'

paraprofessionals,'specialists,'and/or'volunteers'had'been'consulted'before'the'lesson'

began'and'they'knew'what'to'do.'

Comments'

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________'

10.How#well#did#the#teacher#candidate#interact#with#students#during#the#lesson?#

0'There'was'no'interaction'or'interactions'were'cold'and'stilted.'Candidate'may'be'

disrespectful'and'sarcastic'towards'students.'

1'Interactions'with'students'were'not'always'conducive'to'learning.'The'candidate'

appeared'uncomfortable'interacting'with'students'and/or'interacted'inappro p r iat ely .'

Inappr op riately 'cou ld'm ea n:'trea ting 'stud en ts'like'bu d dies ,'being'too'harsh,'not'responding '

to'individual'n eeds ,'not'including'all'learners.'

2'The'candidate'interacted'with'students'appropriately'by'answering'questions,'appearing'

warm'and'friendly'without'being'a'buddy,'meeting'individual'needs,'and'inc l u d i n g 'a ll '

learne rs.'

3'The'candidate’s'interactions'with'students'were'respectful,'encouraged'active'learning,'

prom oted 'inquiry,'was'consistent'with'all'students,'m e t 'in d ividua l 'n e e ds.'

Comments(

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________(

(

11.How&well&did&the&teacher&candidate&meet&the&needs&of&all&learners,&inc luding&those&

with&exceptionalities&and&English&language&learners?&

0(There(was(no(attention(given(to(meeting(the(needs(of(all(learners.(

1(There(was(an(effort(to(meet(these(needs,(but(there(was(not(a(definite(plan.(

2(The(candidate(had(a(definite(plan(in(place(to(meet(the(needs(of(all(learners(and(he/she(

carried(it(out.((

3(The(candidate(had(a(definite(plan(in(place(to(meet(the(needs(of(all(learners(and(carried(

it(out(successfully(as(evidenced(by(student(engagement.(

Comments(

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________(

(

What&were&the&teacher&candidate’s&strengths&during&this&lesson?&

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________(

(

What&improvements&could&be&made?&

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________(

What&are&goals&for&teaching&the&next&time?&

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________(