Supplier Evaluation Form - Florida - Edit, Fill, Sign Online

Vendor Performance Evaluation Requirements

The awarded vendor should note that the Contract Administrator will document the contractor’s

performance by completing a Vendor Performance Evaluation based upon the following:

• For any fixed construction or services contract valued at $30,000 or more upon completion of the

contract.

• For any hardware or software implementation contracts valued at $20,000 or more as part of the final

acceptance

• For any fixed commodities contract valued at $250,000 or more upon complete delivery of the

commodities

• For Master (open-end) Agreements and other continuing contracts by each using agency whose

cumulative annual usage of the agreement exceeds $30,000.

• For Work Authorizations valued at $30,000 or more, issued under a Library of Professional

Consultant Services or a Library of Environmental Consultant Services, upon project completion

• For contracts where the Office of Economic and Small Business Development (OESBD) has

established goals, based on compliance with established goals and requirements.

• The Contract Administrator may also initiate an interim evaluation at any time during the contract

period for any contract

The following Vendor Performance Evaluation Templates are provided for informational purposes. The

templates included are:

1. Final Construction Evaluation

2. Final Consultant – Architect/Engineer Evaluation

3. Vendor Commodity/Service Evaluation

4. Vendor Service Evaluation

5. Goals Participation

BOARD OF COUNT Y COM M ISSIONERS

BROWARD COUNTY, F L ORIDA

PE RF O RM ANCE EV ALUATIO N F O RM

Final Construction Evaluation

CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract/RLI/AgreementNumber ProjectNumber/Title CommissionDistrict(s)

VendorName Phone

AwardAmount ChangeOrders&Amendments No.of TotalCost

$0.00

SubstantialConstructionCompletionDate FinalConstructionCompletionDate

GoalType CountyEstablished VendorCommitted Attained

RECOMMENDEDFORFUTUREUSE

Recomme ndedforfuturecontracts:

IfotherthanYes,providedetailedexplanationasattachment.

StateConditionforRec ommendation:

OverallRating:

YYESES

NO

Conditional

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

4-Good (3.20 - 4.49)

3-Fair (2.60 - 3.19)

2-Poor (1.81 - 2.59)

1-Unsatisfactory (1.0 - 1.8)

2-Poor (1.81 - 2.59)

3-Fair (2.60 - 3.19)

4-Good (3.20 - 4.49)

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

Conditional

NO

NumericalScore:

0.00

GoalEvaluationScore:

0.00

WeightedScore:

0.00

COUNTYCONTACTINFORMATION

ContractAdministratororDelegateName Email

Signature Date

ProjectManagerName Email

Signature Date

EvaluationCriteria

Thisevaluationprovidesanindicationofthevendors'sabilitytoimplementapractical,accurate,completeandcostconsciousproject.Foreach

item,pleaseprovideanumericalscorefrom1to5,inaccordancetotheperformanceratingscale.SelectN/Aifthecriteriadoesnotapplyto

thisevaluation.Reviewercommentsmustbeenteredforaratingof1,2or5.Minimumpassingscoreis2.60.

Thefollowingscaleisusedtorankthelevelofcontributionsmadebythevendortotheproject.

5‐ExcellentPerformance:Projecthadnotimeorcostimpactsrelatedtovendor'sperformance;

4‐GoodPerformance:Projecthadsomeminorissueswhichthevendoraggressivelypursuedtoresolveandtherewereminortimeorcost

impactsrelatedtothecontractor'sperformance;

3‐FairPerformance:Projecthadsomeissueswhichthevendorpursuedtoresolveandthatresultedinacceptabletimeand/orcostimpacts;

2‐PoorPerformance:Projecthadseveralissueswhichthevendorprovidedlimitedassistancetoresolveandthatresultedinsignificanttime

andcostimpacts;

1‐UnsatisfactoryPerformance:Projecthadmultiple,significantissueswhichthevendorprovidednoassistancetoresolveandthatresultedin

substantialtimeandcostimpacts.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

A)ProjectManagement

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.HoweffectivelydidthevendorcommunicatewiththeContractAdministratorand

overCountypersonnelaswellastheconsultant?

2.HowwelldidthevendorcooperatewiththeContractAdministrator,otherCounty

personnelandtheconsultant?

3.Howcloselydidvendorconformwithspecifications,drawingsandother

N/A

requirements?

4.Howappropriatewasthestaffassignedtodotheworktoensureaqualityproduct

onatimelybasis?

5.Howactivelydidthevendorcommunicatewithsubvendorsandothersinvolvedin

project?

6.Howadequateandeffectivewasthevendor'scoordinationandcontrolof

subvendors'workanddocumentation?

7.Howproactivelydidthevendorparticipateintheresolutionofdisputes?

8.Howtimelywerethenoticesofinspectionrequests?

9.Howwelldidthevendorcontroltheprojectbyprovidingrecommendations,

addressingissues,participatingindecisionmaking,andworkingwithgovernment

officialsandtheCounty?

10.Howcleandidthevendorkeeptheworksiteonacontinuousbasis?

COMMENTS:

B)BusinessPractices

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwasthevendor'scompliancewiththeUnitedStatesOccupationalSafetyand

HealthAdministration(O()SHA)andBrowardCounty'sy RiskManaggementDivision,,Safeyy

andOccupationalHealthSectionrequirements?Considerthevendor'sestablished

safetyprogram,compliancewithstandards,safetypractices,accidentprevention,etc.

2.Howwelldidthevendormanagebusinessrelationshipswithsubvendorsby

ensuringthatsubvendorswerefullypaindforworkthathadbeencompletedto

specifications?(Thisinformationcanbeverifiedthroughsubvendorcomplaintsor

liensfornonpayment)

3.Howwelldidthevendormanagebusinessrelationshipswithsubvendorsby

ensureingthatsubvendorswerepromptlypaid?

4.HowwelldidthevendorfollowBrowardCountyprocedureinreportingchangesof

subvendors?

COMMENTS:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

N/A

C)CostControl

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howactivelydidthevendorpursue/takeaggressiveactioninobtainingdocuments

suchasbuildingpermits,CertificateofOccupancyandotherrequireddocumentsona

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

timelybasis?

2.Howactivelydidthevendorparticipateinovercomingproblemswithother

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

vendors,buildingofficials,and/orregulatoryagencies?

3.Howvalidweretheclaimsforextracosts?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4.Howwelldidthevendorcomplywiththeprevailingwageratepolicy?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5.HowwelldidthevendorcomplywiththeCounty'sLivingWageratepolicy(if

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

applicable)?

COMMENTS:

D)Timeliness

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwelldidthevendormanagedeliveryofnecessaryequipmentandmaterialfor

theproject?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2.Howtimelyandaccuratewerepaymentrequestswhensubmitted?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3.Howwelldidthevendormeetthescheduleofdeliverablesestablishedatthe

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

beginningoftheproject?

4.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinordertomeet

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

theplannedcompletiondatesforPhaseCompletion?

5.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinordertomeet

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

theplannedcompletiondatesforSubstantialCompletion?

6.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinordertomeet

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

theplannedcompletiondatesforFinalCompletion?

7.HoweffectivelydidthevendorcommunicatewiththeContractAdministratorand

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

otherCountypersonnelaswellastheconsultant?

COMMENTS:

E)ChangeOrderManagement

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Didthevendorprovideindependentestimatesofthevalueofchanges?

2.Howaccurateandtimelywerethepreliminaryestimatesofthevalueofchange

orders/amendmentsprovidedbythevendor?

3.Howaccurateandtimelywerechangeorders/amendmentsprocessedwiththe

properdocumentation?

4.Howfairandtimelydidthevendorprepare,negotiateandmakerecommendations

totheCountyregardingchangeorders/amendments?

5.Howappropriatewerethevendor'srecommendationsfortimeextensionsbased

ontheactualcircumstancesandreviewedagainstthecontractrequirements?

COMMENTS:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Yes No N/A

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

F)QualityofWork

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howaccessiblewastheworkforinspection?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2.Howcloseweretheequipmentandmaterialstothespecifications?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3.Howcloselywereindustrystandardconstructionmethodsfollowed?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4.Howresponsiveandcompetentweresuperintendents,supervisors,andworkers?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

COMMENTS:

G)ProjectCloseout

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwelldidtheprojectmeetspecifiedstandardswheninspected?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2.Howcompleteandaccuratewasthedocumentationprovidedatthecompletionof

theproject,includingpunchlist,warranties,operation,appropriatemanualsand

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

CertificateofOccupancyfromtheappropriatejurisdiction?

3.Howcleandidthevendorleavetheworksitebycompletelydisposingofdebrisina

legalmanner?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4.Howaccurateandtimelywerethevendor'sfinalprojectaccountingdocuments

senttoBrowardCounty?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

COMMENTS:

RATINGOFFICIALINFORMATION

NameandTitle Office

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

BOARD OF CO UNTY CO MMISS IONERS

BROWARD COUNTY , FLORIDA

PERFO RMANCE EV ALUATION FORM

Fina l Consul t a nt - Architec t /Engi ne e r Ev aluat ion

CONTRACT INFO RMATION

Contract/RLI/AgreementNumber ProjectNumber/Title CommissionDistrict(s)

VendorName Phone

AwardAmount ChangeOrders&Amendments No.of TotalCost

$0.00

SubstantialConstructionCompletionDate FinalConstructionCompletionDate

GoalType CountyEstablished VendorCommitted Attained

RECOMMENDEDFORFUTUREUSE

Recommendedforfuturecontracts:

GoalEvaluationScore:

0.00

IfotherthanYes,providedetailedexplanationasattachment.

StateConditionforRecommendation:

OverallRating:

GoalEvaluationScore:

0.00

WeightedScore:

0.00

1-Unsatisfactory (1.0 - 1.8)

2-Poor (1.81 - 2.59)

3-Fair (2.60 - 3.19)

4-Good (3.20 - 4.49)

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

YES

Conditional

NO

COUNTYCONTACTINFORMATION

ContractAdministra tororDelegateName Email

Signature Date

ProjectManagerName Email

Signature Date

EvaluationCriteria

Thisevaluationprovidesanindicationofthevendors'sabilitytoimplementapractical,accurate,completeandcostconsciousproject.For

eachitem,pleaseprovideanumericalscorefrom1to5,inaccordancetotheperformanceratingscale.SelectN/Aifthecriteriadoesnot

applytothisevaluation.Reviewercommentsmustbeenteredforaratingof1,2or5.Minimumpassingscoreis2.60.

Thefollowingscaleisusedtorankthelevelofcontributionsmadebythevendortotheproject.

5‐ExcellentPerformance:Projecthadnotimeorcostimpactsrelatedtovendor's performance;

4‐GoodPerformance:Projecthadsomeminorissueswhichthevendoraggressivelypursuedtoresolveandtherewereminortimeorcost

impactsrelatedtothecontractor'sperformance;

3‐FairPerformance:Projecthadsomeissueswhichthevendorpursuedtoresolveandthatresultedinacceptabletimeand/orcostimpacts;

2‐PoorPerformance:Projecthadseveralissueswhichthevendorprovidedlimitedassistancetoresolveandthatresultedinsignificanttime

andcostimpacts;

1‐UnsatisfactoryPerformance:Projecthadmultiple,significantissueswhichthevendorprovidednoassistancetoresolveandthatresulted

insubstantialtimeandcostimpacts.

1-Unsatisfactory (1.0 - 1.8)

2-Poor (1.81 - 2.59)

3-Fair (2.60 - 3.19)

4-Good (3.20 - 4.49)

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

YES

Conditional

NO

A)PreliminaryDesign/EngineeringServices

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howeffectivewerethevendor'smeetingwithCounty toclarifyanddefinethe

County'srequirementsfortheproject?

2.Howknowledgeablewasthevendorregardingthejurisdictionofvarious

governmentauthoritiesinvolvedintheapprovalprocess?

3.Howrealisticwasthescheduleandbudgetfortheprojectaspresentedbythe

designteam?

4.Howsuitablewerethedesignresultstothesite?

5.Howwelldidthedesignmeetuserobjectivesandspecificprogramrequirements?

6.Howwelldidthedesignmeetcostlimitations?

7.Howclearanddetailedweretheplans?

8.Howaccurateweretheplans?

9.Howtimelywerethesubmittalsoftheplans?

10.Howwelldidthevendoranticipateandaddresspotentialconstructionconflicts

withunderground/overheadutilities?

11.Howappropriatewasthelevelofcompletionofthespecificationssubmitted

witheachdesignphase?

COMMENTS:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

N/A

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

B)CostControl

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howhelpfulwastheprojectdurationandthenecessaryjustificationwhich

providedbythevendorinallowingtheCountytoevaluateforconcurrence?

2.Howactivelydidthevendorpursue/takeaggressiveactioninobtaining

documentssuchasbuildingpermits,CertificateofOccupancyandotherrequired

documentsonatimelybasis?

3.Howeffectivewasthevendoratfindingwaystoreduceone‐timeconstruction

costs,longtermmaintenance,orstaffingrequirementsbyspecifyingalternative

materialsordesigns?

4.Howactivelydidthevendorparticipateinovercomingproblemswithother

vendors,buildingofficials,and/orregulatoryagencies?

5.Howvalidweretheclaimsforextracosts?

COMMENTS:

C)Timeliness

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwelldidthevendormeetthescheduleofdeliverablesestablishedatthe

beginningoftheproject?

2.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinorderto

meettheplannedcompletiondatesforPhaseCompletion?

3.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinorderto

meettheplannedcompletiondatesforSubstantialCompletion

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

N/A

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4.Howwelldidthevendorconformwithscheduleofworkprogressinorderto

meettheplannedcompletiondatesforFinalCompletion

COMMENTS:

D)Permitting

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howinvolvedwasthevendorintheefforttogetpermitsfromappropriate

jurisdictions?

2.Howcompleteweretheplanssubmittedforpermitting?

3.Howcompletewastheinitialdesignwhichwassubmittedtotheregulatory

agenciesasreflectedbythecommentsreceivedfromtheregulatoryagencies?

4.HoweffectivelydidthevendorcommunicatewiththeCountyregardingissues

thatwerebeingresolvedby regulatoryagencies?

5.Howeffectivelydidthevendorcommunicateandprovidetherequirednoticesto

theCountyregardingthestatusofthepermits?

6.Howtimelywerepermitapplicationssubmittedsoasnottodelaytheproject?

COMMENTS:

E)BidDocuments

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howcarefullydidtheconsultantreviewallbiddingdocumentsforconflictsor

inconsistenciesbetweendocumentsprep aredbytheCountyandthosepreparedby

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

inconsistenciesbetweendocumentspreparedbytheCountyandthosepreparedby

thedesignteam?

2.Howsupportivewastheconsultantatthepre‐bidmeeting?

3.Howaccurateandtimelywasthevendor'sinputtoaddendainresponseto

marketplaceinquiries?

4.Howcompleteandclearwerethespecificationswhichweredistributedtothe

marketplaceasreflectedbythenumberofaddendaneededtorectifyspecification

issuesortheextentionofthebidopendate?

5.Howactivelydidthevendorcontributetotheevaluationofselectedvendors'

responsibilityintheareasofresearch,reference,credit,equipmentavailabilityand

staffexpertise?

6.Howactivelydidthevendorcontributetotheevaluationofcontractorbidsfor

realisticpriceandtime,fairnessandreasonableness?

COMMENTS:

F)ConstructionAdministration

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.HowtimelyweresealedshopdrawingsprovidedtotheCounty?

2.Howfrequentlydidthevendormakesitevisitstoobservetheproject's

construction?

3.Howproactivewasthevendortointerveneasnecessaryifissueswereobserved

duringsitevisits?

4.Howclearandconciseweretheinstructionsprovidedbythevendortothe

contractorandhowwelldidtheyfacilitateaprofessionalrelationship?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5.Howtimelywereconstructionissuesrelatedtothevendor'sscopeof

responsibilityresolved?

COMMENTS:

G)ContractChangeManagement(Amendments)

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Didthevendorprovideindependentestimatesofthevalueofchanges?

2.Howaccurateandtimelywerethepreliminaryestimatesofthevalueofchange

orders/amendmentsprovidedbythevendor?

3.Howaccurateandtimelywerechangeorders/amendmentsprocessedwiththe

properdocumentation?

4.Howfairandtimelydidthevendorprepare,negotiateandmake

recommendationstotheCountyregardingchangeorders/amendments?

5.Howappropriatewerethevendor'srecommendationsfortimeextensionsbased

ontheactualcircumstancesandreviewedagainstthecontractrequirements?

6.HowwelldidthevendorfollowBrowardCountyprocedureinreportingchangeof

subvendors?

COMMENTS:

H)ProjectCloseout

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwelldidtheprojectmeetspecifiedstandardswheninspected?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Yes No N/A

2.Howcompleteandaccuratewasthedocumentationprovidedatthecompletion

oftheproject,includingpunchlist,warranties,operation,appropriatemanualsand

CertificateofOccupancyfromtheappropriatejurisdiction?

3.Howaccurateandtimelywerethevendor'sfinalprojectaccountingdocuments

senttoBrowardCounty?

COMMENTS:

RATINGOFFICIALINFORMATION

NameandTitle Office

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Yes No N/A

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

BROWARD COUNT Y, FLORIDA

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Vendor Commodity/Service Evaluation

CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract/RLI/AgreementNumber ProjectNumber/Title EvaluationPeriod

From: To:

VendorName ContractPeriod

From: To:

ProjectDescription/Phases ContractType

CCoommommoddiittyy

CCoommommoddiittyy//SSeerrviviccee

AwardAmount ChangeOrders&Amendments No.of RevisedContractAmount

$0.00

FORSOFTWAREPURCHASESMORE FinalAcceptanceDate

THAN$20,000

Installation & Setup Warranty Period Maint enance P e r iodWarranty Period Maint enance P e r iodInstallation & Setup

Claims

NoNo Cl Claaiimsms

ClaimsinProcess FromVendor AgainstVendor

FinalizedClaims FromVendor AgainstVendor

Date Date

GoalType CountyEstablished VendorCommitted Attained

RECOMMENDEDFORFUTUREUSE

Recommendedforfuturecontracts:

IfotherthanYes,providedetailedexplanationasattachment.

StateConditionforRecommendation:

YESESES

NO

Conditional

YYYESYESYES

Conditional

NO

NumericalScore:

0.00

OverallRating:

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

4-4-GGoodood ( (33..20 -20 - 4. 4.49)49)

3-3-FairFair ( (2.2.60 -60 - 3. 3.19)19)

2-Poor (1.81 - 2.59)

1-Unsatisfactory (1.0 - 1.8)

5-Excellent (4.50 - 5.00)

GoalEvaluationScore:

0.00

WeightedScore:

0.00

COUNTYCONTACTINFORMATION

RequestingAgencyRepresentativeNameandTitle Email

Signature Date

PurchasingUnitRepresentativeNameandTitle Email

Signature Date

EvaluationCriteria

Thisevaluationprovidesanindicationofthevendors'sabilitytoimplementapractical,accurate,completeandcostconsciousproject.For

eachitem,pleaseprovideanumericalscorefrom1to5,inaccordancetotheperformanceratingscale.SelectN/Aifthecriteriadoesnot

applytothisevaluation.Reviewercommentsmustbeenteredforaratingof1,2or5.Minimumpassingscoreis2.60.

Thefollowingscaleisusedtorankthelevelofcontributionsmadebythevendortotheproject.

5‐ExcellentPerformance:Projecthadnotimeorcostimpactsrelatedtovendor'sperformance;

4‐GoodPerformance:Projecthadsomeminorissueswhichthevendoraggressivelypursuedtoresolveandtherewereminortimeorcost

impactsrelatedtothecontractor'sperformance;

3‐FairPerformance:Projecthadsomeissueswhichthevendorpursuedtoresolveandthatresultedinacceptabletimeand/orcostimpacts;

2‐PoorPerformance:Projecthadseveralissueswhichthevendorprovidedlimitedassistancetoresolveandthatresultedinsignificanttime

andcostimpacts;

1‐UnsatisfactoryPerformance:Projecthadmultiple,significantissueswhichthevendorprovidednoassistancetoresolveandthatresulted

insubstantialtimeandcostimpacts.

A)Quality

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howresponsivewasthevendortonotificationofanunauthorizedsubstitution?

2.Howclosedidthedeliveredproduct(s)orsoftwareperformtoexpectations?

3.Howaccurateandtimelywereanynecessaryrepairsorreconfigurations?

4.Howtimelywerenecessarypartsorsoftwaremadeavailable?

5.Howappropriatewereanyvendorrecommendedrepairsorupgrades?

6.Howefficientandtimelywereproduct/softwareinstallationsandtraining

completed?

7.Howcompleteandtimelydidthevendorsubmitwarranties,manuals,etc.?

8.Howwelldidthevendorperf ormancemeetagreementexpectations?

COMMENTS:

B)Quantity

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howwelldidtheamountofproductshippedmatchtheamountordered?

2.Howfastwerepartialdeliveriesornon‐deliveriessatisfied?

3.Iftherewerebackorders,howaccuratewereestimatesofdeliverytimes?

4.Howaccuratewastheweightoftheitemreceivedascomparedtotheweight

li t d th ii?

listedontheinvoice?

5.Howaccuratewasthepaperworkintheshipment?

6.Howaccuratewerethelicensingestimatesforthesoftwareinstallation(s)?

COMMENTS:

C)Delivery

SectionScore:

0.00

EvaluationQuestion Unsatisfactory Excellent

1.Howtimelywasthecompleteorderreceived,basedonindustrystandards?

2.Howwellwastheshipmentprotectedagaindamageorloss?

3.Howresponsivewasthevendortonoticeofdamagedgoods?

4.Howproactivewasthevendorresponsetoreplacingdamagedgoods?

5.Howcooperativewasthevendorinmakingthedeliveryatasatisfactorytime?

6.Howaccuratewerethepricesquotedtotheinvoicedprice?

7.Howaccuratewerethedocumentsprovideatcloseout,e.g.packingslips,

invoices,technicalmanuals,etc.regardingthecorrectmaterialcodesand

purchaseordernumbers?

8.Howaccuratewasthemethodofdelivery?

9.Howcorrectwasthedeliverylocation?

10.Howvisibleweretherequiredinspectionstamps?

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

N/A

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Fillable Printable Supplier Evaluation Form - Florida

Fillable Printable Supplier Evaluation Form - Florida

Supplier Evaluation Form - Florida