Fillable Printable Educator Evaluation Form
Fillable Printable Educator Evaluation Form
Educator Evaluation Form
Educator Evaluation Form
Grass Lake Community Schools
Evaluator ’s Name:
T eacher’s Name:
Building:
Subject/Grade:
Component 1: Planning and Pr e paration ( 15 %)
Ineffective
Minimally
Effective
Effective
Highly
Effective
0
1
2
3
Lessons clearly aligned with content exp e c ta tions.
Demon stra te s knowled ge of content a nd instruction.
Daily le sso n p lans are e vid ent.
Designs lessons in a clear and logical manner.
Plans include a variety of teaching methods and evaluation
strategies.
Pla ns incl ude differe ntiatio n to r e flect students’ intere sts,
ability and history, a s need e d.
Demonstrates knowledge of current resources.
See ks to us e technol ogy and re s ourc es t o enhance student
le ar nin g and engagement.
Co mments Re gar d in g Planning and Preparation:
/15
Component 2: Instruc tio n (20%)
Ineffective
Minimally
Effective
Effective
Highly
Effective
0
1
2
3
Communicates clearly and accurately.
Utilizes a variety o f teaching strategies and resources.
Demon stra te s qua lity interactions with students.
Recognizes and adjusts teaching to accommodate student
differences.
Comme nts Re gard ing I nst ruction:
/20
Component 3: Classroom Environment (15%)
Ineffective
Minimally
Effective
Effective
Highly
Effective
0
1
2
3
Creating an environment of respect and rapport.
Establishing a culture o f learning.
Managing classroom procedures.
Managi ng s tudent behavi or.
Co mments Re gar d in g Classroom Environment:
/15
Component 4: Professionalism (15%)
Ineffective
Minimally
Effective
Effective
Highly
Effective
0
1
2
3
Maintaining accurate and timely records.
Co mmunicates with fa milies e f fectivel y.
Exhibit s ef fective p rofessional re la tionships.
Grows and develops professionally.
Maintains the p rofes sional stand a rds set by the distr ic t
such as, b ut not limited to : dre ss code , FE RPA, attendance,
punctuali ty, etc.
Comme nts Re gard ing Pr ofessionali sm:
/15
Component 5: Stude nt Grow th (35%)
Ineffective
Minimally
Effective
Effective
Highly
Effective
0
1
2
3
Use of data to improve st udent growth.
Meeting building and district improveme nt goals.*
Improves student growth.*
Co mments Re gar d in g Student Growth:
*Teacher and Ad ministrator’s data sources (one or more each) to each be weighted at 50% for this category. /35
NOTE: By a mutually agreed upon date, the evaluator and teacher will meet to put in writing the selected assessment that will
be used as data source s in this evalua tion. If other a ssessments will be used , a written rationale will be provide d as to why it
was chosen. T he administrator and teacher inp ut in the collection of growth data will be of equal value in the assessment
process. Professional development of the educator is essential in the gro wth process. If an educator or their administrato r feels
specific professional development wo uld be important to improving student gro wth, it can b e discussed during this process.
Teacher will provide in w r iting his/her acc omplishments and special training.
Teacher Perfor ma nce Rating:
95 - 100% Highly Effective
72 – 94.9% Effective
60 – 71.9% Minimally Effective
0 – 59.9% Ineffective TOTA L: ___________/100 points
Overall Perfor-
mance Rating: ____Ineffective ____Minimally Effective ____Effective ____Highly Effective
Teacher’s Name:
Teacher’s Signature: Date:
Administrator’s Signature: Date:
The teacher’s signature acknowledges receipt of a copy of this docume nt and the awareness of the oppo r tunity to write a
response to this eva luatio n app raisal wit hin 3 business days.
I wish to submit a writte n re sp onse to b e a tta c hed to this ev a luatio n.
Remarks by Teacher:
NOTE: E valuator’s narrative should be attached to this form.
NOTE: This template is b a sed o n the wor k o f Char lotte Danielson.
08-11
